The article ethical and social justice issues

Review Of an Empirical, Peer-Reviewed Research Article
The article ethical and social justice issues: the case of correctional institutions by Azemi, Fexamines the ethical and social justice issues surrounding correctional institutions. It discusses the various staff involved in running these institutions and their multiple challenges. The article highlights the importance of considering prisoners’ rights and the need for reform in how these institutions are run. It is clear that there are many challenges faced by those involved in running correctional institutions and that reform is needed to ensure that prisoners are treated fairly and with respect for their human rights.
Accordingly, the article is well-researched and characterizes the various issues surrounding correctional institutions.
Characterizing the central issue of the article, the case of the Corcoran State Prison, the brutality of officers toward inmates in “gladiator style and betting practices by correctional officers, pushed officer Caruso and Rigg to report this case to the media” is discussed. Accordingly, a detailed account of the events is covered, whereby the author provides a clear and concise explanation of the ethical and social justice issues in this case.The Kosovo Correctional Service Commission conducted the most recent investigation, which found some instances of mistreatment of inmates. Still, overall, the conditions in Kosovo’s correctional institutions were satisfactory. However, the Commission also noted a need for improvement in some areas, such as providing food, water, and medical care.
From the several case studies provided, there is a long-standing debate about the appropriate treatment of inmates in correctional institutions. Inmates have complained of being mistreated, beaten, and denied food and water. Various international and local organizations have investigated these claims with mixed results. Notably, the case of Kosovo’s correctional institutions highlights the complex ethical and social justice issues involved in the treatment of inmates.The two main camps in this debate are those who believe that inmates should be treated humanely with dignity, and respect, regardless of their crimes – and those who believe that inmates should be treated according to the severity of their crimes, with harsher punishments for more serious offences. The latter group often argues that correctional institutions should be places of rehabilitation where inmates can learn from their mistakes and change their ways.
The article also examines the strategies that correctional institutions in Kosovo use to maintain responsible conduct in light of ethical and social justice issues. The author interviewed staff members at threedifferent correctional institutions in Kosovo to gain insights into the strategies used to promote responsible conduct among inmates and staff.The findings indicated that the strategy used by correctional institutions varied depending on the type of institution. For example, one process used by all institutions was providing inmates with opportunities to participate in educational and vocational programs. This was seen as a way to help inmates become more productive members of society and reduce the likelihood of recidivism. Other strategies included maintaining a strong focus on security, promoting communication and collaboration between staff members, and providing inmates with opportunities to engage in positive leisure activities.Overall, the author found that the strategies used by Kosovo correctional institutions effectively promote responsible conduct among inmates and staff. However, the author also noted that there is room for improvement in implementing these strategies.
It is evident that the article also deals with the significant ethical challenges and conflicts of responsibility regarding correctional institutions. The author first defines the concept of social justice and its main principles. He then proceeds to analyze correctional institutions’ main ethical challenges and conflicts of responsibility. He concludes that they are related to the principles of social justice, such as fairness, equality, and dignity. Social justice is the fair and just treatment of all individuals in society. The main principles of social justice are fairness, equality, and dignity. The first challenge is related to the direction of fairness. The challenge is that some correctional institutions are unfair and provide no equality to all inmates. For example, some correctional institutions give preferential treatment to inmates who have money or are connected to influential people. The third challenge is related to the principle of dignity, whereby some correctional institutions do not treat all inmates with dignity. For example, they do not provide adequate food or healthcare to inmates.
Everyone should be treated with respect and dignity, which should be ingrained in the organization’s culture. Many correctional facilities do not treat staff and inmates fairly. To ensure that everyone in the penitentiary system is treated equally, responsible administrators must establish a policy. Implementing equitable treatment and compensation for the same duties will help lessen inequality issues in this regard. Administrators that fail to take action when it is necessary to address problems with human rights, equality, liberty, and justice run the risk of paying a steep price, such as losing their careers, when the issues are brought to light by whistleblowers or through other channels.
Nevertheless, the analysis and decision-making model is a comprehensive and versatile framework for analyzing and addressing ethical and social justice issues in correctional institutions. The model is based on a thorough understanding of the ethical principles governing the correctional system and the social justice principles of fairness, equality, and respect for human dignity. The model provides a step-by-step guidefor identifying and addressing ethical and social justice issues. The model is also very user-friendly and can be easily applied to many moral and social justice issues in correctional institutions.
The author argues that three main ethical issues need to be considered in these settings: the treatment of prisoners, the treatment of staff, and the treatment of the institution itself. The recommendations highlight the importance of considering the rights of all parties involved in the correctional system and the need to create a system that is just and fair for all. Conclusively, recommendations for future research should focus on the impact of social justice issues on the operation of correctional institutions.
In conclusion, the article is well-written and thoroughly analyzes the issues. The article discusses ethical and social justice issues related to correctional institutions. The author argues that there are many problems with how these institutions are run, including the lack of respect for human rights, equality, and liberty within correctional institutions. He argues that inmates are often treated poorly, with little regard for their basic needs or human dignity. This can lead to further problems, such as mental health issues and re-offending. The author also highlights the lack of equality within these institutions, as some inmates are given preferential treatment while others are mistreated. This can create a sense of injustice among inmates, further exacerbating the correctional system’s problems. Despite this, the author does not offer concrete solutions to the problems he highlights, which would have been helpful. The article provides a valuable overview of the ethical and social justice issues surrounding these institutions but offers no concrete solutions.

Reference
Azemi, F. (2019). ETHICAL AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES: THE CASE OF CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(4), 1-10.